Andreas Frithioff, Martin Frendø, Kenneth Weiss, Søren Foghsgaard, Peter Trier Mikkelsen, Thomas Winther Frederiksen, David Bue Pedersen, Mads Sølvsten Sørensen, Steven Arild Wuyts Andersen

3-D-Printed Models for Temporal Bone Training: A Validity Study

  • Neurology (clinical)
  • Sensory Systems
  • Otorhinolaryngology
Save to CiteDrive Show PDF

Objective3-D printing offers convenient and low-cost mastoidectomy training; nonetheless, training benefits using 3-D-printed temporal bones remain largely unexplored. In this study, we have collected validity evidence for a low-cost, 3-D-printed temporal bone for mastoidectomy training and established a credible pass/fail score for performance on the model.Study designA prospective educational study gathering validity evidence using Messick's validity framework.SettingSeven Danish otorhinolaryngology training institutions.ParticipantsEighteen otorhinolaryngology residents (novices) and 11 experienced otosurgeons (experts).InterventionResidents and experienced otosurgeons each performed two to three anatomical mastoidectomies on a low-cost, 3-D-printed temporal bone model produced in-house. After drilling, mastoidectomy performances were rated by three blinded experts using a 25-item modified Welling scale (WS).Main outcome measureValidity evidence using Messick's framework including reliability assessment applying both classical test theory and Generalizability theory.ResultsNovices achieved a mean score of 13.9 points; experienced otosurgeons achieved 23.2 points. Using the contrasting groups method, we established a 21/25-point pass/fail level. The Generalizability coefficient was 0.91, and 75% of the score variance was attributable to participant performance, indicating a high level of assessment reliability. Subsequent D studies revealed that two raters rating one performance or one rater rating two performances were sufficiently reliable for high-stakes assessment.ConclusionValidity evidence supports using a low-cost, 3-D-printed model for mastoidectomy training. The model can be printed in-house using consumer-grade 3-D printers and serves as an additional training tool in the temporal bone curriculum. For competency-based training, we established a cut-off score of 21 of 25 WS points using the contrasting groups method.

Need a simple solution for managing your BibTeX entries? Explore CiteDrive!

  • Web-based, modern reference management
  • Collaborate and share with fellow researchers
  • Integration with Overleaf
  • Comprehensive BibTeX/BibLaTeX support
  • Save articles and websites directly from your browser
  • Search for new articles from a database of tens of millions of references
Try out CiteDrive

More from our Archive