Wei Sun, Yu Xu, WangJun Yan, ChunMeng Wang, Tu Hu, ZhiGuo Luo, XiaoWei Zhang, Xin Liu, Yong Chen

A real‐world study of adjuvant anti‐PD ‐1 immunotherapy on stage III melanoma with BRAF, NRAS, and KIT mutations

  • Cancer Research
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Oncology
Save to CiteDrive Show PDF

AbstractBackgroundMelanoma frequently harbors BRAF, NRAS, or KIT mutations which influence both tumor development and treatment strategies. For example, it is still controversial whether adjuvant anti‐PD‐1 monotherapy or BRAF/MEK inhibitors may better improve the survival for resected BRAF‐mutant melanoma. Furthermore, outcomes for melanoma with NRAS and KIT mutation receiving adjuvant immunotherapy remain unclear.MethodsOne hundred seventy‐four stage III melanoma patients who underwent radical surgery in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) during January 2017 to December 2021 were included in this real‐world study. Patients were followed up until death or May 30th, 2022. Pearson's chi‐squared test or Fisher's exact test was performed for univariable analysis of the different category groups. Log‐rank analysis was used to identify the prognostic factors for disease‐free survival (DFS).ResultsThere were 41 (23.6%) patients with BRAF mutation, 31 (17.8%) with NRAS mutation, 17 (9.8%) with KIT mutation, and 85 (48.9%) wild‐type patients without either genomic alteration of those three genes. Most ( n  = 118, 67.8%) of them were acral melanoma, while 45 (25.9%) were cutaneous subtype, and 11 were (6.3%) primary unknown. Among them, 115 (66.1%) patients received pembrolizumab or toripalimab monotherapy as adjuvant therapy; 22 (12.6%) patients received high‐dose interferon (IFN), and 37 (21.3%) patients were just for observation. There was no statistical difference in clinicopathologic factors between anti‐PD‐1 group and IFN/OBS group. Of all the enrolled patients, anti‐PD‐1 group had a better DFS than IFN/OBS group ( p  = 0.039). In anti‐PD‐1 group, patients with BRAF or NRAS mutations had poorer DFS than wild‐type group. No survival difference was found among patients harboring different gene mutations in IFN/OBS group. In wild‐type patients, anti‐PD‐1 group had a better DFS than IFN/OBS group ( p  = 0.003), while no survival benefits were found for patients with BRAF, NRAS, or KIT mutations.ConclusionAlthough anti‐PD‐1 adjuvant therapy provides a better DFS in the general population and in wild‐type patients, patients with BRAF, KIT or, especially, NRAS mutation may not benefit further from immunotherapy than conventional IFN treatment or observation.

Need a simple solution for managing your BibTeX entries? Explore CiteDrive!

  • Web-based, modern reference management
  • Collaborate and share with fellow researchers
  • Integration with Overleaf
  • Comprehensive BibTeX/BibLaTeX support
  • Save articles and websites directly from your browser
  • Search for new articles from a database of tens of millions of references
Try out CiteDrive

More from our Archive