AbstractThis paper presents a program of action for the philosophy of regulatory science, based on a general theory of social epistemology. Two candidates are considered. The first one, offered by Alvin Goldman, is not fit for our purposes because it is focused on a veritism incompatible with non‐epistemic aims of regulatory science. The second, championed by Steve Fuller, sociologically investigates the existing means of producing knowledge, to modify them with the goal of obtaining democratic aims through action on a legislative meta‐level. The program has been built upon this procedure, instantiated by the identification, characterization, and modification of epistemic policies.

More from our Archive

• DOI: 10.1111/beer.12573 2023

  Impact of digital transformation on performance of environment, social, and governance: Empirical evidence from China

  Quan‐Jing Wang, Hai‐Jie Wang, Gen‐Fu Feng, Chun‐Ping Chang

• DOI: 10.1111/beer.12572 2023

  The differential impact of substantive and symbolic CSR attribution on job satisfaction and turnover intention

  Xin Chen, Eric Hansen, Jianfeng Cai, Jichang Xiao

• DOI: 10.46222/pharosjot.104.411 2023

  The Use of Smartphones to Communicate the Gospel of Jesus Christ

  Gedala Mulliah Naidoo

• DOI: 10.1111/mila.12466 2023

  Creating a large language model of a philosopher

  Eric Schwitzgebel, David Schwitzgebel, Anna Strasser

• DOI: 10.1177/14777509231188830 2023

  The paradox of medical necessity

  Samantha Godwin, Brian D Earp

• DOI: 10.1111/beer.12576 2023

  Not all stakeholders are equal: Corporate social responsibility variability and corporate financial performance

  Yongqiang Gao, Yumeng Nie, Taïeb Hafsi

• DOI: 10.1111/japp.12674 2023

  Responsibility for Future Climate Justice: The Direct Responsibility to Mitigate Structural Injustice for Future Generations

  Daan Keij, Boris Robert van Meurs

• DOI: 10.1111/josh.13360 2023

  Academic Accommodations for Middle and High School Students Following a Concussion: Perspectives of Teachers and School Administrators

  Heather A. Shepherd, Keith O. Yeates, Nick Reed, Jeffrey G. Caron, Kathryn J. Schneider, Carolyn A. Emery, Amanda M. Black

• DOI: 10.1111/beer.12574 2023

  Corporate environmental efforts, government environmental subsidies, and corporate <scp>non‐environmental</scp> R&amp;D intensity: Evidence from listed firms

  Weihong Chen, David Diwei Lv, Christina W. Y. Wong

• DOI: 10.1111/pops.12906 2023

  Why Chile “Woke Up.” Antecedents of the Formation of Prochange Group Consciousness Promoting Collective Action

  Stefanie Hechler, Maria Chayinska, Clara Sophie Wekenborg, Felipe Moraga‐Villablanca, Thomas Kessler, Craig McGarty