In control research and design it is frequently necessary to explore, evaluate, tune and compare many control strategies. These activities are assisted by software tools of increasing complexity; however, even with the existing high performance tools these activities are very time consuming due to they imply hundred if not thousand of simulations. If the process of doing such simulations is not automated it can be a very time consuming task. There has been proposed evolutionary algorithms (EA) that in the search for an optimal control automatically generate many control structures. However, the space of possible controllers for any dynamical system is huge. Hence it is mandatory to restrict the search space. The best way to restrict the controller search space is to let the designer influence the search direction. In this paper we propose a software tool for control research that has as its main part an EA that produce only controllers having a pre-specified morphology. By specifying a controller morphology the designer can influence the search direction without losing the exploration capability of evolutionary algorithms. The EA is endowed with a cost function tailored for fast evaluation of closed-loop controller performance. The use of the tool is illustrated by searching an sliding mode and similar controllers for an unstable linear and two nonlinear systems.

More from our Archive

• DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad424 2023

  Evaluation of AlphaFold-Multimer prediction on multi-chain protein complexes

  Wensi Zhu, Aditi Shenoy, Petras Kundrotas, Arne Elofsson

• DOI: 10.3390/a16070337 2023

  A Hybrid Model for Analysis of Laser Beam Distortions Using Monte Carlo and Shack–Hartmann Techniques: Numerical Study and Experimental Results

  Ilya Galaktionov, Julia Sheldakova, Alexander Nikitin, Vladimir Toporovsky, Alexis Kudryashov

• DOI: 10.1002/jcc.27187 2023

  Accurate thermochemistry at affordable cost by means of an improved version of the JunChS‐F12 model chemistry

  S. Di Grande, M. Kállay, V. Barone

• DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad437 2023

  SBOannotator: a Python tool for the automated assignment of systems biology ontology terms

  Nantia Leonidou, Elisabeth Fritze, Alina Renz, Andreas Dräger

• DOI: 10.3390/a16070324 2023

  A Fast Surrogate Model-Based Algorithm Using Multilayer Perceptron Neural Networks for Microwave Circuit Design

  Mohammad (Behdad) Jamshidi, Salah I. Yahya, Saeed Roshani, Muhammad Akmal Chaudhary, Yazeed Yasin Ghadi, Sobhan Roshani

• DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad418 2023

  KG-Hub—building and exchanging biological knowledge graphs

  J Harry Caufield, Tim Putman, Kevin Schaper, Deepak R Unni, Harshad Hegde, Tiffany J Callahan, Luca Cappelletti, Sierra A T Moxon, Vida Ravanmehr, Seth Carbon, Lauren E Chan, Katherina Cortes, Kent A Shefchek, Glass Elsarboukh, Jim Balhoff, Tommaso Fontana, Nicolas Matentzoglu, Richard M Bruskiewich, Anne E Thessen, Nomi L Harris, Monica C Munoz-Torres, Melissa A Haendel, Peter N Robinson, Marcin P Joachimiak, Christopher J Mungall, Justin T Reese

• DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad203 2023

  A gated graph transformer for protein complex structure quality assessment and its performance in CASP15

  Xiao Chen, Alex Morehead, Jian Liu, Jianlin Cheng

• DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad228 2023

  TSignal: a transformer model for signal peptide prediction

  Alexandru Dumitrescu, Emmi Jokinen, Anja Paatero, Juho Kellosalo, Ville O Paavilainen, Harri Lähdesmäki

• DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad411 2023

  MDTips: a multimodal-data-based drug–target interaction prediction system fusing knowledge, gene expression profile, and structural data

  Xiaoqiong Xia, Chaoyu Zhu, Fan Zhong, Lei Liu

• DOI: 10.3390/a16070343 2023

  Deep Learning for Detecting Verticillium Fungus in Olive Trees: Using YOLO in UAV Imagery

  Marios Mamalis, Evangelos Kalampokis, Ilias Kalfas, Konstantinos Tarabanis