The determination of the sustainable development of a region requires estimating its carrying capacity in terms of resources and environment. It is essential to investigate the carrying capacity of Kunming City to comprehend its rapid development and create a resource and environment-friendly society. This research involved the selection of a set of 35 evaluation indicators from three categories: resources, environment, and social economy. These indicators were chosen based on statistical data obtained from Kunming City between 2011 and 2020. An evaluation system was established using the entropy weight method to determine the weight of these indicators. Subsequently, the fuzzy matter–element analysis method was utilized to construct the European closeness model of Kunming’s resource and environmental carrying capacity. The correlation between the carrying capacity of resources and environment and sub-carrying capacities was analyzed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient to determine the degree of influence of different aspects on the carrying capacity of resources and environment in Kunming. The results show a consistent upward trend in the carrying capacity of resources and environment in Kunming City from 2011 to 2019. However, in 2020, due to national policy adjustments and the impact of COVID-19 on the social economy, the resource and environment carrying capacity index in Kunming City slightly decreased.

More from our Archive

• DOI: 10.3390/su151310543 2023

  The State of the Art in Deep Learning Applications, Challenges, and Future Prospects: A Comprehensive Review of Flood Forecasting and Management

  Vijendra Kumar, Hazi Md. Azamathulla, Kul Vaibhav Sharma, Darshan J. Mehta, Kiran Tota Maharaj

• DOI: 10.3390/su151410821 2023

  Microplastics as an Emerging Threat to the Global Environment and Human Health

  Shampa Ghosh, Jitendra Kumar Sinha, Soumya Ghosh, Kshitij Vashisth, Sungsoo Han, Rakesh Bhaskar

• DOI: 10.3390/su151310663 2023

  Unraveling the Interrelationship of Digitalization, Renewable Energy, and Ecological Footprints within the EKC Framework: Empirical Insights from the United States

  Najia Saqib, Ivan A. Duran, Ilhan Ozturk

• DOI: 10.3390/su151310645 2023

  Green Environmental Management System to Support Environmental Performance: What Factors Influence SMEs to Adopt Green Innovations?

  Abdalwali Lutfi, Hamza Alqudah, Mahmaod Alrawad, Ahmad Farhan Alshira’h, Malek Hamed Alshirah, Mohammed Amin Almaiah, Adi Alsyouf, Mohammed Faisal Hassan

• DOI: 10.3390/su151411065 2023

  Green Finance, Enterprise Energy Efficiency, and Green Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from China

  Hepei Li, Chen Chen, Muhammad Umair

• DOI: 10.3390/su151310729 2023

  Innovations and the CO2 Emissions Nexus in the MENA Region: A Spatial Analysis

  Haider Mahmood, Maham Furqan, Najia Saqib, Anass Hamadelneel Adow, Muzaffar Abbas

• DOI: 10.3390/su151310442 2023

  Sustainable Potato Growth under Straw Mulching Practices

  Abdul Waheed, Chuang Li, Murad Muhammad, Mushtaq Ahmad, Khalid Ali Khan, Hamed A. Ghramh, Zhongwei Wang, Daoyuan Zhang

• DOI: 10.3390/su151310329 2023

  From Neglect to Progress: Assessing Social Sustainability and Decent Work in the Tourism Sector

  Eleonora Santos

• DOI: 10.3390/su151410976 2023

  Driving Sustainable Disaster Risk Reduction: A Rapid Review of the Policies and Strategies in Saudi Arabia

  Ahmed M. Al-Wathinani, Dennis G. Barten, Marta Borowska-Stefańska, Paweł Gołda, Noora A. AlDulijan, Mohammad A. Alhallaf, Lujain O. Samarkandi, Abdullah S. Almuhaidly, Mariusz Goniewicz, Waleed O. Samarkandi, Krzysztof Goniewicz

• DOI: 10.3390/su151410940 2023

  Wastewater Treatment and Reuse for Sustainable Water Resources Management: A Systematic Literature Review

  Jorge Alejandro Silva