Drone surveys are gaining popularity for many construction applications, including in the fields of civil engineering, such as road construction, earthwork, structure monitoring, and coastal topography analysis. Drone surveying has a high potential for periodical long-term ground settlement measurement in the field of geotechnical engineering. Traditionally, manual measurement has been performed for limited points with controlled surface measurement points, but drone surveying may enable automated and periodical measurement for a wide and remote site. However, the accuracy of the elevation measurement and the surface settlement prediction has not been investigated, and the use of drone surveying has thus been limited. Therefore, an experiment was carried out to apply drone LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) surveying for soft ground settlement measurement at a large land reclamation site showing a very large settlement up to 10 m. Periodic drone LiDAR surveying was conducted, and the data were processed with direct georeferencing and with outlier removals (such as trees and construction vehicles) in order to generate a clean surface point cloud. We then compared the processed elevation data with ground control data to check the vertical accuracy and to predict the settlement as well as for consolidation. The drone LiDAR survey showed 13 cm, 42.9 cm, and 6.23% differences in RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) in terms of vertical accuracy, predicted long-term settlement, and consolidation, respectively. The drone LiDAR accuracy seems very useful for monitoring settlement over a large and remote land reclamation site of soft ground, showing settlement up to several meters where, without a surface measurement, installment is limited.

More from our Archive

• DOI: 10.3390/app13148275 2023

  A Brief Review of Machine Learning Algorithms in Forest Fires Science

  Ramez Alkhatib, Wahib Sahwan, Anas Alkhatieb, Brigitta Schütt

• DOI: 10.3390/app13137783 2023

  Identification of Subsurface Mesoscale Crack in Full Ceramic Ball Bearings Based on Strain Energy Theory

  Xiaotian Bai, Zhaonan Zhang, Huaitao Shi, Zhong Luo, Tao Li

• DOI: 10.3390/app13148122 2023

  A Survey on Formal Verification and Validation Techniques for Internet of Things

  Moez Krichen

• DOI: 10.1063/5.0153716 2023

  Peristaltic transport of MHD Ree–Eyring fluid through a flexible channel under the influence of activation energy

  M. Ajithkumar, P. Lakshminarayana, K. Vajravelu

• DOI: 10.3390/app13137744 2023

  New Trends in 4D Printing: A Critical Review

  Somayeh Vatanparast, Alberto Boschetto, Luana Bottini, Paolo Gaudenzi

• DOI: 10.3390/app13148175 2023

  Boiling vs. Microwave Heating—The Impact on Physicochemical Characteristics of Bell Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) at Different Ripening Stages

  Remigiusz Olędzki, Joanna Harasym

• DOI: 10.1063/5.0158292 2023

  On the propagation of cnoidal wave and overtaking collision of slow shear Alfvén solitons in low <b> <i>β</i> </b> magnetized plasmas

  Salemah A. Almutlak, Shahida Parveen, Shahzad Mahmood, Anisa Qamar, B. M. Alotaibi, S. A. El-Tantawy

• DOI: 10.1063/5.0156571 2023

  Optimization of painting efficiency applying unique techniques of high-voltage conductors and nitrotherm spray: Developing deep learning models using computational fluid dynamics dataset

  Mohammad-Reza Pendar, Sílvio Cândido, José Carlos Páscoa

• DOI: 10.1063/5.0156543 2023

  Assessment of the aerodynamic benefits of collocating horizontal- and vertical-axis wind turbines in tandem using actuator line model

  Yixiao Shao, Jie Su, Yu Tu, Limin Kuang, Zhaolong Han, Kai Zhang, Dai Zhou

• DOI: 10.1063/5.0155532 2023

  Couple stress fluid flow enclosing a solid sphere in a porous medium: Effect of magnetic field

  Pankaj Kumar Maurya, Satya Deo, Deepak Kumar Maurya