Introduction: Sensory impairment of the upper limb is common after stroke and negatively impacts a stroke survivor’s recovery. The acute phase is a critical time for the identification of post-stroke somatosensory impairments and occupational therapists have a key role in the acute stroke setting. Sensory assessment and treatment practices of occupational therapists working in acute stroke settings are largely unknown. This study aims to describe current clinical practice and identify the barriers and enablers for the assessment of sensory impairment in patients post stroke within acute stroke units. Method: A mixed-methods approach was utilised, with an Australian national cross-sectional online survey of occupational therapists ( n = 85) and state-based focus groups ( n = 2). Descriptive analyses and thematic analysis were conducted. Findings: The majority of clinicians (78%) use non-standardised measures to assess for somatosensory impairment. Three qualitative themes were identified: acute setting contextual factors, individual patient characteristics and priorities, and clinician knowledge and perceived benefits. Conclusion: Occupational therapists working within acute stroke units are aware of the importance of assessing sensory impairment of the upper limb post stroke. However, the majority use non-standardised approaches and called for a standardised quick-to-administer tool kit that is readily available in acute stroke units.

More from our Archive

• DOI: 10.1177/03080226231183281 2023

  Parents living with and beyond cancer: A scoping review of unmet supportive care needs and impact on daily life

  Robin Newman, Jennifer Kaldenberg, Laura Stursberg, Brianna Pinto, Christine Jimenez, Kara Glazer

• DOI: 10.1155/2023/1828314 2023

  Art-Based Workshops for Women: An Opportunity for Reflection on Identity and Transformation following Cancer Treatment

  Marie-Christine Ranger, Sandra Houle, Alysson Rheault, Roanne Thomas

• DOI: 10.1177/03080226231184708 2023

  Post-COVID-19 survivors’ strategies for improving occupational balance: A qualitative study

  Amin Mahdizadeh, Hamidreza Khankeh, Hasan Ghodsi, Seyed Ali Hosseini, Nazila Akbarfahimi

• DOI: 10.1177/03080226231181018 2023

  Bringing therapy home: Exploring parents’ experiences of telehealth for children with developmental coordination disorder

  Aisling Bourke, Una O’Connor, Bryan Boyle, Jessica Kennedy, Helen Lynch

• DOI: 10.1177/03080226231184992 2023

  Early occupational therapy in mechanically ventilated patients improves functional status: Study protocol

  Evelyn Álvarez, Maricel Garrido, Felipe Salech, Verónica Rojas, Nicole Jara, José I. Farías, Daniela Ponce, Eduardo Tobar

• DOI: 10.1177/03080226231183291 2023

  Home environment design theories and models related to the occupational performance, participation and well-being of people with intellectual disabilities: A scoping review

  Audrey Su Lin Yong, David Haines, Leonard Henry Joseph

• DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12897 2023

  Are two occupational therapists better than one? Occupational therapists' perspectives of intra‐disciplinary practice within community health

  Melissa Kaye Evans, Haylee Lane, Danielle Patricia Hitch, Victoria Tull, Genevieve Pepin

• DOI: 10.1177/03080226231183293 2023

  Exploring the usability of a smartphone application to monitor fatigue and activity for people with acquired brain injury

  Leisle Ezekiel, Jose Juan Dominguez Veiga, Tomas Ward, Helen Dawes, Johnny Collett

• DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12896 2023

  Unlocking the restraint—Development of a behaviour change intervention to increase the provision of modified constraint‐induced movement therapy in stroke rehabilitation

  Ashan Weerakkody, Robyn Emmanuel, Jocelyn White, Erin Godecke, Barby Singer

• DOI: 10.1177/03080226231184994 2023

  Assessment of sensory impairment of the upper limb post-stroke by occupational therapists within the acute setting: A mixed methods study exploring current clinical practice

  Danielle Byrne, Liana S. Cahill, Christopher Barr, Stacey George