Characterization of a novel VenusX orthogonal dual‐layer multileaf collimator
Qingxin Wang, Qifeng Li, Zhongqiu Wang, Chengwen Yang, Daguang Zhang, Jun Wang, Ping Wang, Wei Wang- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
- Instrumentation
- Radiation
Abstract
Purpose
To investigate and characterize the performance of a novel orthogonal dual‐layer alpha multileaf collimator (αMLC) mounted on the LinaTech VenusX linac.
Methods
We evaluated leaf positioning accuracy and reproducibility using an electronic portal imaging device through the picket fence test. The average, interleaf, intraleaf, and leaf tip transmissions of the single and dual layers were measured using an ionization chamber. Square and rhombus fields were used to evaluate the leaf penumbra of αMLC. To investigate the advantages of the orthogonal dual‐layer multileaf collimator (MLC) in field shaping, right triangular and circular pattern fields were formed using both the dual layers and single layers of the αMLC.
Results
The average maximum positioning deviations of the upper and lower αMLC over 1 year were 0.76 ± 0.09 mm and 0.62 ± 0.07 mm, respectively. The average transmissions were 1.87%, 1.83%, and 0.03% for the upper‐, lower‐ and dual‐layer αMLC, respectively. The maximum interleaf transmissions of the lower‐ and dual‐layer were 2.43% and 0.17%, respectively. The leaf tip transmissions were 9.34% and 0.25%, respectively. The penumbra of the square field was 6.2 mm in the X direction and 8.0 mm in the Y direction. The average penumbras of the rhombus fields with side lengths of 5 and 10 cm were 3.6 and 4.9 mm, respectively. For the right triangular and circular fields, the fields shaped by the dual‐layer leaves were much closer to the set field than those shaped by single‐layer leaves. The dose undulation amplitude of the 50% isodose lines and leaf stepping angle change of the dual‐layer leaves were smaller than those of the single‐layer leaves.
Conclusions
The αMLC benefits from its orthogonal dual‐layer design. Leaf transmission, dose undulations at the field edge, and MLC field dependence of the leaf stepping angle of the dual‐layer αMLC were remarkably reduced.