DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010217 ISSN: 2077-0383

Continuous Treatment with Tofacitinib but Not Filgotinib Is Effective in Non-Responders with Active Ulcerative Colitis: A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis

Soichi Yagi, Hirokazu Fukui, Maiko Ikenouchi, Tetsuya Shiraishi, Koji Kaku, Midori Wakita, Yasuhiro Takagi, Toshiyuki Sato, Mikio Kawai, Koji Kamikozuru, Yoko Yokoyama, Tetsuya Takagawa, Toshihiko Tomita, Shinichiro Shinzaki

Background: Few studies have compared the efficacy and safety of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). We compared the real-world effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib (TOF) and filgotinib (FIL) as induction therapy for UC by propensity score-matching analysis. Methods: We enrolled 230 patients with active UC who received either TOF (n = 197) or FIL (n = 33) as induction therapy. The primary outcome was the clinical response at week 8, and the secondary outcomes were the clinical response/remission rates from weeks 2–8, including the course of patients without a clinical response/remission at week 4. Results: Propensity score-matching analysis revealed that the clinical response rate gradually increased to 72.2% at 8 weeks in the TOF group, whereas it tended to decrease to 48.5% in the FIL group. Clinical remission rates increased from 2 (36.7% vs. 36.7%) to 8 weeks (63.6% vs. 48.5%) after treatment in the TOF and FIL groups, respectively. The clinical response rate was higher in the TOF group than in the FIL group at week 8 in patients without a clinical response at week 4 (38.5% vs. 0%; p = 0.011). The clinical remission rate was also higher in the TOF group than in the FIL group at week 8 in patients without clinical remission at week 4 (50.0% vs. 16.7%; p = 0.046). The incident rates of infection and anemia were higher in the TOF group than in the FIL group. Conclusions: TOF may be more effective than FIL at 8 weeks for patients with UC who do not respond to treatment within the first 4 weeks.

More from our Archive