Criterion (Concurrent) Validity and Clinical Utility of the Tongueometer Device
Brittany N. Krekeler, Anna Hopkins, Meredith E. Tabangin, Mekibib Altaye, Rachel Roberts, Raneh Saadi, Bonnie Martin-Harris, Nicole Rogus-PuliaPurpose:
Tongue manometry (i.e., tongue pressure measurement) is a commonly used assessment for patients with suspected oral-motor involvement in swallowing disorders. Availability of lingual manometry has changed in recent years, with the introduction of the Tongueometer device being a more affordable tongue manometry system. The purpose of this study was to test concurrent (criterion) validity of the Tongueometer compared to the current standard reference device, the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI).
Method:
Adults without dysphagia were recruited for participation in this study. Standard lingual measurements (swallowing-related pressures, maximum isometric pressure [MIP], and maximum isometric endurance) were recorded, with the bulb anteriorly placed, with both devices, in a randomized order. The Bland–Altman method was used to determine concurrent (criterion) validity of these measurements compared to the clinical standard IOPI device. A recently available suggested corrective value by
Results:
The final sample included 70 adult participants aged 20–89 years ( M age = 52.3 years). Measures with the Tongueometer device were significantly lower when compared with the same measures taken using the IOPI ( p < .01) for all measures including MIP, endurance, and swallow pressures. The correction suggested by Curtis and colleagues did not ameliorate these differences.
Conclusions:
The Tongueometer lingual measurements were consistently lower compared to the IOPI. Clinical use of values taken with the Tongueometer device should be compared to normative data published for each specific device. Available features of each device (e.g., display, bulb texture, technology/application) should be considered when selecting which device to use with an individual patient.