We use experimental and simulation data to recalibrate the standard Spalart–Allmaras model. Free-shear flow, the buffer layer, the log layer, and flows with adverse pressure gradients are targeted. In this process, the recalibration does not affect untargeted flows. Our approach uses Bayesian optimization and feedforward neural networks. The recalibrated model is implemented in two codes and tested in 11 flows: the majority of which are outside the training dataset and have geometries that are distinctly different from those in the training dataset. We show that the data-enabled recalibration offers improvements while preserving the model’s existing good behavior. In particular, our recalibration improves the model’s behavior in separated flows while preserving its existing good behaviors in flat-plate boundary-layer flows and channel flows. Further analysis indicates that the improvements in separated flow are mainly due to the recalibrated [Formula: see text] function and the resulting, more precise representation of the “slingshot” effect.

More from our Archive

• DOI: 10.2514/1.j062341 2023

  Improved Amplification Factor Transport Transition Model for Transonic Boundary Layers

  Yuxuan Wang, Jiakuan Xu, Lei Qiao, Yang Zhang, Junqiang Bai

• DOI: 10.3390/drones7070471 2023

  An Efficient Framework for Autonomous UAV Missions in Partially-Unknown GNSS-Denied Environments

  Michael Mugnai, Massimo Teppati Losé, Edwin Herrera-Alarcón, Gabriele Baris, Massimo Satler, Carlo Avizzano

• DOI: 10.3390/drones7070467 2023

  Flow Structure around a Multicopter Drone: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis for Sensor Placement Considerations

  Mauro Ghirardelli, Stephan T. Kral, Nicolas Carlo Müller, Richard Hann, Etienne Cheynet, Joachim Reuder

• DOI: 10.2514/1.j062870 2023

  Data-Enabled Recalibration of the Spalart–Allmaras Model

  Yuanwei Bin, George Huang, Xiang I. A. Yang

• DOI: 10.1177/10775463231188160 2023

  Modular quasi-zero-stiffness isolator based on compliant constant-force mechanisms for low-frequency vibration isolation

  Bingxiao Ding, Xuan Li, Shih-Chi Chen, Yangmin Li

• DOI: 10.3390/drones7070446 2023

  TGC-YOLOv5: An Enhanced YOLOv5 Drone Detection Model Based on Transformer, GAM & CA Attention Mechanism

  Yuliang Zhao, Zhongjie Ju, Tianang Sun, Fanghecong Dong, Jian Li, Ruige Yang, Qiang Fu, Chao Lian, Peng Shan

• DOI: 10.3390/aerospace10070614 2023

  Machine Learning Assisted Prediction of Airfoil Lift-to-Drag Characteristics for Mars Helicopter

  Pengyue Zhao, Xifeng Gao, Bo Zhao, Huan Liu, Jianwei Wu, Zongquan Deng

• DOI: 10.3390/aerospace10070600 2023

  Natural Language Processing (NLP) in Aviation Safety: Systematic Review of Research and Outlook into the Future

  Chuyang Yang, Chenyu Huang

• DOI: 10.3390/drones7070438 2023

  Digitalization and Spatial Documentation of Post-Earthquake Temporary Housing in Central Italy: An Integrated Geomatic Approach Involving UAV and a GIS-Based System

  Ilaria Tonti, Andrea Maria Lingua, Fabio Piccinini, Roberto Pierdicca, Eva Savina Malinverni

• DOI: 10.3390/aerospace10070638 2023

  Airfoil Analysis and Optimization Using a Petrov–Galerkin Finite Element and Machine Learning

  Pedro Areias, Rodrigo Correia, Rui Melicio