Donna Shu-Han Lin, An-Li Yu, Hao-Yun Lo, Cheng-Wei Lien, Jen-Kuang Lee, Fu-Tien Chiang, Yu-Kang Tu

Differential effects of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on cardiovascular and renal outcomes according to renal function: a dose–response meta-analysis involving 10 randomized clinical trials and 71 553 individuals

  • Endocrinology
  • General Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Abstract Background The main target of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), the sodium–glucose cotransporters 2, is found in the kidneys, and their activity is reduced in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). How the efficacy of SGLT2i may vary in patients with different levels of renal impairment has not been fully elucidated. Methods We searched the PubMed databases for relevant studies published through May 25, 2022. Randomized control trials comparing SGLT2i with placebo and reporting cardiovascular or renal outcomes were included. The primary outcome was the composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), which were defined as cardiovascular death (CV death), nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and nonfatal ischemic stroke. Secondary outcomes included the components of MACE, all-cause mortality, hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), the composite of CV death and HHF, and composite renal outcomes. Linear meta-regression analysis was used to assess the effects of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) on the risks associated with SGLT2i treatment vs placebo for all outcomes. Nonlinear meta-regression analysis was also performed for MACE to investigate the combined influence of reduced drug efficacy in CKD but possible greater risk reduction in a population with higher risk at baseline. Further analyses were performed by including additional study-level covariates, including the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM), heart failure (HF), and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Results Risk ratios for MACE, CV death, nonfatal MI, HHF, and composite renal outcomes associated with SGLT2i treatment were not significantly related to baseline eGFR values. A positive association was observed between eGFR values and the risk of stroke with SGLT2i use (regression coefficient β = .0109, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.0029–0.0188). A similar positive association was observed between eGFR values and the composite outcome of CV death and HHF (β = .0025, 95% CI 0.0000–0.0051). The results of the meta-regression analyses, including the additional covariates of DM, HF, and ASCVD, were consistent with the results of the primary analyses for most outcomes. Conclusion The protective effects of SGLT2i for reducing most adverse cardiovascular and renal outcomes persisted in patients with variable degrees of renal impairment. The observed benefits such as preventing CV death, HF worsening, or stroke may be greater for patients with more severe CKD. Considering the cardiovascular and renal benefits associated with SGLT2i treatment, patients with CKD should be treated aggressively to improve outcomes. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021273500

Need a simple solution for managing your BibTeX entries? Explore CiteDrive!

  • Web-based, modern reference management
  • Collaborate and share with fellow researchers
  • Integration with Overleaf
  • Comprehensive BibTeX/BibLaTeX support
  • Save articles and websites directly from your browser
  • Search for new articles from a database of tens of millions of references
Try out CiteDrive

More from our Archive