Linear-stability-theory-based [Formula: see text] method plays an important role in boundary-layer transition prediction of aeronautical flows. Based on the simplification of linear stability theory (Drela and Giles, AIAA J, 1987), the amplification factor transport (AFT) equation for Tollmien–Schlichting waves using local variables was first proposed in 2013 (Coder and Maughmer, AIAA J, 2014). However, in transonic high-Reynolds-number flows, the AFT model seriously overestimates the value of [Formula: see text]. To fix this problem, we have conducted many linear stability analyses to rebuild the formulations of AFT model. Compressibility effect, which has a significant impact on the prediction of [Formula: see text] value, has been considered in the improved version. Coupled with the [Formula: see text] model for crossflow instabilities (Xu et al., CJA, 2020), the improved AFT model is established for transonic boundary layers. Several classic test cases are successfully employed to validate present AFT model, including a flat plate, an airfoil, an infinite swept wing, a sickled-shape wing, a 6:1 inclined prolate spheroid, the NASA Common Research Model, and ARA Transonic Swept Wing. Our prediction results show that both Tollmien–Schlichting instabilities and stationary crossflow instabilities can be captured and predicted well by the improved [Formula: see text] model in subsonic and transonic boundary layers.

More from our Archive

• DOI: 10.2514/1.j062341 2023

  Improved Amplification Factor Transport Transition Model for Transonic Boundary Layers

  Yuxuan Wang, Jiakuan Xu, Lei Qiao, Yang Zhang, Junqiang Bai

• DOI: 10.3390/drones7070471 2023

  An Efficient Framework for Autonomous UAV Missions in Partially-Unknown GNSS-Denied Environments

  Michael Mugnai, Massimo Teppati Losé, Edwin Herrera-Alarcón, Gabriele Baris, Massimo Satler, Carlo Avizzano

• DOI: 10.3390/drones7070467 2023

  Flow Structure around a Multicopter Drone: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis for Sensor Placement Considerations

  Mauro Ghirardelli, Stephan T. Kral, Nicolas Carlo Müller, Richard Hann, Etienne Cheynet, Joachim Reuder

• DOI: 10.2514/1.j062870 2023

  Data-Enabled Recalibration of the Spalart–Allmaras Model

  Yuanwei Bin, George Huang, Xiang I. A. Yang

• DOI: 10.1177/10775463231188160 2023

  Modular quasi-zero-stiffness isolator based on compliant constant-force mechanisms for low-frequency vibration isolation

  Bingxiao Ding, Xuan Li, Shih-Chi Chen, Yangmin Li

• DOI: 10.3390/drones7070446 2023

  TGC-YOLOv5: An Enhanced YOLOv5 Drone Detection Model Based on Transformer, GAM & CA Attention Mechanism

  Yuliang Zhao, Zhongjie Ju, Tianang Sun, Fanghecong Dong, Jian Li, Ruige Yang, Qiang Fu, Chao Lian, Peng Shan

• DOI: 10.3390/aerospace10070614 2023

  Machine Learning Assisted Prediction of Airfoil Lift-to-Drag Characteristics for Mars Helicopter

  Pengyue Zhao, Xifeng Gao, Bo Zhao, Huan Liu, Jianwei Wu, Zongquan Deng

• DOI: 10.3390/aerospace10070600 2023

  Natural Language Processing (NLP) in Aviation Safety: Systematic Review of Research and Outlook into the Future

  Chuyang Yang, Chenyu Huang

• DOI: 10.3390/drones7070438 2023

  Digitalization and Spatial Documentation of Post-Earthquake Temporary Housing in Central Italy: An Integrated Geomatic Approach Involving UAV and a GIS-Based System

  Ilaria Tonti, Andrea Maria Lingua, Fabio Piccinini, Roberto Pierdicca, Eva Savina Malinverni

• DOI: 10.3390/aerospace10070638 2023

  Airfoil Analysis and Optimization Using a Petrov–Galerkin Finite Element and Machine Learning

  Pedro Areias, Rodrigo Correia, Rui Melicio