DOI: 10.1111/clr.14115 ISSN: 0905-7161

Marginal bone level changes around dental implants with one or two adjacent teeth – A clinical and radiographic retrospective study with a follow‐up of at least 10 years

Lucienne D. Weigel, Angelina Scherrer, Lucas Schmid, Alexandra Stähli, Jean‐Claude Imber, Andrea Roccuzzo, Giovanni E. Salvi
  • Oral Surgery

Abstract

Aim

To compare mean bone level (mBL) changes around dental implants with one or two adjacent teeth after a function time of ≥10 years.

Materials and Methods

One hundred thirty three periodontally compromised patients (PCPs) with 551 implants enrolled in supportive periodontal care (SPC) were screened. Implants were categorized either into group TIT (tooth‐implant‐tooth) or into group TIG (tooth‐implant‐gap). MBL changes from delivery of restoration (i.e., baseline) to follow‐up were calculated in millimeters and compared between implants and adjacent teeth. Survival rates and the need for surgical interventions during SPC were recorded.

Results

Eighty seven patients with 142 implants were re‐evaluated after a mean observation time of 14.5 ± 3.5 years. The mBL at mesial implant sites in the TIT group increased −0.07 ± 0.92 mm and decreased in the TIG group 0.52 ± 1.34 mm, respectively (95% CI: 0.04/1.14, p = .037). At distal implant sites, the mBL in the TIT group increased −0.08 ± 0.84 mm and decreased 0.03 ± 0.87 in the TIG group, respectively (95% CI: −0.20/0.42, p = .48). The overall implant loss rate was 3.5% (n = 5; 2 TIT, 3 TIG), without a statistically significant difference between the two groups (95% CI: 0.18/7.07, p = .892). Tooth loss rates (TIT: 12.3%, TIG: 12.3%) were not statistically significantly different (OR = 1.00, p = .989).

Conclusion

High tooth and implant survival rates were observed in PCPs. The presence of one or two adjacent teeth seemed to have no impact on marginal bone level changes.

More from our Archive