Reflections on access to care for heavy menstrual bleeding: Past, present, and in times of the COVID‐19 pandemic

Abstract

The symptom of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) affects at least a quarter of reproductive‐age menstruators. However, given the variance in diagnosing the underlying causes, barriers, and inequity in access to care for HMB, and therefore reporting of HMB, this figure is likely to be a gross underestimate. HMB can have a detrimental impact on quality of life. From the limited reports available it is estimated that around 50%–80% of people with HMB do not seek care for this debilitating symptom, and for those that do, it may take years until the first treatment action. Almost half of those with HMB believe their condition is unworthy of treatment, that there is no treatment available, or that it is “normal”. The term “medical gaslighting” has recently been used to describe how healthcare professionals disregard people's symptoms. This has the ensuing effect of negatively compounding self‐doubt and embarrassment around menstrual bleeding, creating a cycle of diminished experience inhibiting further seeking of care. There is a scarcity of intervention studies informing increased access to care. Multilevel approaches are needed to increase access to care and support for those with HMB. During the COVID‐19 global pandemic, barriers to care access and support for HMB have been exacerbated and, given the significant pressures that this pandemic has placed on healthcare services worldwide, it will take many years to recover. In the meantime, it is crucial to ensure that medically “benign” conditions such as the symptom of HMB are not overlooked.