AbstractOn 3 August 2014, a destructive earthquake with a magnitude of 6.5 occurred in the Ludian region in Yunan, China, causing heavy casualties. However, the seismogenic structure of the Ludian earthquake is still unclear. To address this issue, we have developed a three‐dimensional joint inversion algorithm for magnetotelluric data and seismic body wave arrival times based on the cross gradient structural similarity constraint, which utilizes the complementary advantages of the two different datasets. We use arrival times of P‐ and S‐waves from 6,369 local earthquakes recorded by 30 seismic stations and magnetotelluric impedances from 127 MT stations to perform the joint inversion to construct a combined 3‐D P‐wave velocity (Vp), S‐wave velocity (Vs), and resistivity models and the locations of relocated aftershocks in the source region of the Ludian earthquake. Our models show significant low Vp/Vs ratios and low resistivity in the upper crust of the main shock zone, and the relocated aftershocks form an L‐shaped zone. Based on petrophysical studies and analysis of the cross‐plots of different physical properties, we infer the existence of cracks/fractures and fluids as well as high quartz contents in the source region. These fluids may play a key role in promoting the Ludian earthquake by reducing the effective normal stress of the fault zone, and the existence of high quartz contents further makes the crustal rocks in the source region more brittle. Our study provides a new evidence how the properties of the crust in the focal area have some control on the genesis of moderate to large earthquakes.

More from our Archive

• DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stad1984 2023

  Analysing the large-scale bulk flow using cosmicflows4: increasing tension with the standard cosmological model

  Richard Watkins, Trey Allen, Collin James Bradford, Albert Ramon, Alexandra Walker, Hume A Feldman, Rachel Cionitti, Yara Al-Shorman, Ehsan Kourkchi, R Brent Tully

• DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stad2032 2023

  <i>JWST</i> early Universe observations and ΛCDM cosmology

  Rajendra P Gupta

• DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stad2046 2023

  Feedback reshapes the baryon distribution within haloes, in halo outskirts, and beyond: the closure radius from dwarfs to massive clusters

  Mohammadreza Ayromlou, Dylan Nelson, Annalisa Pillepich

• DOI: 10.1029/2022je007612 2023

  Mineralogy, Morphology, and Emplacement History of the Maaz Formation on the Jezero Crater Floor From Orbital and Rover Observations

  Briony Horgan, Arya Udry, Melissa Rice, Sanna Alwmark, Hans E. F. Amundsen, James F. Bell, Larry Crumpler, Brad Garczynski, Jeff Johnson, Kjartan Kinch, Lucia Mandon, Marco Merusi, Chase Million, Jorge I. Núñez, Patrick Russell, Justin I. Simon, Michael St. Clair, Kathryn M. Stack, Alicia Vaughan, Brittan Wogsland, Andrew Annex, Andreas Bechtold, Tor Berger, Olivier Beyssac, Adrian Brown, Ed Cloutis, Barbara A. Cohen, Sarah Fagents, Linda Kah, Ken Farley, David Flannery, Sanjeev Gupta, Svein‐Erik Hamran, Yang Liu, Gerhard Paar, Cathy Quantin‐Nataf, Nicolas Randazzo, Eleni Ravanis, Steven Sholes, David Shuster, Vivian Sun, Christian Tate, Nick Tosca, Meenakshi Wadhwa, Roger C. Wiens

• DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stad2013 2023

  The Dark Energy Survey Year 3 and eBOSS: constraining galaxy intrinsic alignments across luminosity and colour space

  S Samuroff, R Mandelbaum, J Blazek, A Campos, N MacCrann, G Zacharegkas, A Amon, J Prat, S Singh, J Elvin-Poole, A J Ross, A Alarcon, E Baxter, K Bechtol, M R Becker, G M Bernstein, A Carnero Rosell, M Carrasco Kind, R Cawthon, C Chang, R Chen, A Choi, M Crocce, C Davis, J DeRose, S Dodelson, C Doux, A Drlica-Wagner, K Eckert, S Everett, A Ferté, M Gatti, G Giannini, D Gruen, R A Gruendl, I Harrison, K Herner, E M Huff, M Jarvis, N Kuropatkin, P-F Leget, P Lemos, J McCullough, J Myles, A Navarro-Alsina, S Pandey, A Porredon, M Raveri, M Rodriguez-Monroy, R P Rollins, A Roodman, G Rossi, E S Rykoff, C Sánchez, L F Secco, I Sevilla-Noarbe, E Sheldon, T Shin, M A Troxel, I Tutusaus, N Weaverdyck, B Yanny, B Yin, Y Zhang, J Zuntz, M Aguena, O Alves, J Annis, D Bacon, E Bertin, S Bocquet, D Brooks, D L Burke, J Carretero, M Costanzi, L N da Costa, M E S Pereira, J De Vicente, S Desai, H T Diehl, J P Dietrich, P Doel, I Ferrero, B Flaugher, J Frieman, J García-Bellido, S R Hinton, D L Hollowood, K Honscheid, D J James, K Kuehn, O Lahav, J L Marshall, P Melchior, J Mena-Fernández, F Menanteau, R Miquel, J Newman, A Palmese, A Pieres, A A Plazas Malagón, E Sanchez, V Scarpine, M Smith, E Suchyta, M E C Swanson, G Tarle, C To,

• DOI: 10.3390/life13071472 2023

  Exploring the Frontiers of Neuroimaging: A Review of Recent Advances in Understanding Brain Functioning and Disorders

  Chiahui Yen, Chia-Li Lin, Ming-Chang Chiang

• DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stad2101 2023

  Jellyfish galaxies with the IllustrisTNG simulations – when, where, and for how long does ram pressure stripping of cold gas occur?

  Eric Rohr, Annalisa Pillepich, Dylan Nelson, Elad Zinger, Gandhali D Joshi, Mohammadreza Ayromlou

• DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stad2087 2023

  MUSE Analysis of Gas around Galaxies (MAGG) – V. Linking ionized gas traced by C <scp>iv</scp> and Si <scp>iv</scp> absorbers to Ly α emitting galaxies at <i>z</i> ≈ 3.0–4.5

  Marta Galbiati, Michele Fumagalli, Matteo Fossati, Emma K Lofthouse, Rajeshwari Dutta, J Xavier Prochaska, Michael T Murphy, Sebastiano Cantalupo

• DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stad2001 2023

  Identifying the SN 2022acko progenitor with <i>JWST</i>

  Schuyler D Van Dyk, K Azalee Bostroem, WeiKang Zheng, Thomas G Brink, Ori D Fox, Jennifer E Andrews, Alexei V Filippenko, Yize Dong, Emily Hoang, Griffin Hosseinzadeh, Daryl Janzen, Jacob E Jencson, Michael J Lundquist, Nicolas Meza, Dan Milisavljevic, Jeniveve Pearson, David J Sand, Manisha Shrestha, Stefano Valenti, D Andrew Howell

• DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stad2031 2023

  The halo mass function and filaments in full cosmological simulations with fuzzy dark matter

  Simon May, Volker Springel