Abstract The common law and natural law traditions have both sought authority in ‘reason’ and the ‘laws of nature’. Pollock applied this logic in explaining judicial development of negligence: the application of reason to emerging science and technology. The equivalent today is a growing body of scientific evidence that humans are destroying their own habitat through climate change, biodiversity destruction and pollution. Humanity depends on its habitat for survival and therefore each step in this direction increases the risk of its extinction. The courts are already being asked to declare as unlawful governmental decisions that breach human rights and statutory or constitutional protection of the environment. This perspective article proposes that when presented with scientific evidence of habitat destruction in judicial review cases, the courts could examine whether a decision is unlawful and/or irrational. This ‘Paradox Test’ would ask: (1) will the decision contribute to the destruction of the human habitat and (2) if so, is it justified on the ground of necessity? It is proposed that a decision that failed such a test would be unlawful and irrational as contrary to what is arguably the most fundamental law of nature: species survival. The essay defines the Paradox Test, sets it in an historical context and positions it as implicitly inside the boundaries of current English doctrine of judicial review, where it would need to be judicially recognized. Consequently, practitioners are invited to apply the test in court and to share their experience.

More from our Archive

• DOI: 10.1177/10775463231188160 2023

  Modular quasi-zero-stiffness isolator based on compliant constant-force mechanisms for low-frequency vibration isolation

  Bingxiao Ding, Xuan Li, Shih-Chi Chen, Yangmin Li

• DOI: 10.3390/wevj14070177 2023

  Single-Wheel Failure Stability Control for Vehicle Equipped with Brake-by-Wire System

  Jian Zhou, Yage Di, Xuelong Miao

• DOI: 10.1177/10775463231185482 2023

  Adaptive backstepping dynamic sliding mode control for maglev turning motor spindle based on limited time preset performance

  Houcai Liu, Zheng Cao, Huimin Kang, Zhihai Ouyang, Lianghui Duan

• DOI: 10.1177/14680874231183768 2023

  Axis-symmetric diesel spray flame model coupled with momentum flux distribution measurement and improved soot phi-T map

  Takayuki Fuyuto, Yoshiyuki Mandokoro, Yuki Tagita, Tsutomu Umehara

• DOI: 10.1177/10775463231190263 2023

  Computational analysis of thermoelastic vibrations of functionally graded nonlocal nanobeam excited by thermal shock

  Ahmed E Abouelregal, Rakhi Tiwari

• DOI: 10.3390/wevj14070188 2023

  State of Health Assessment for Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Incremental Energy Analysis and Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory

  Yanmei Li, Laijin Luo, Chaolong Zhang, Huihan Liu

• DOI: 10.1177/14680874231185421 2023

  Assessment of design and location of an active prechamber igniter to enable mixing-controlled combustion of ethanol in heavy-duty engines

  Jared Zeman, Ziming Yan, Michael Bunce, Adam Dempsey

• DOI: 10.1093/oxfclm/kgad005 2023

  The Paradox Test in Climate Litigation

  Adam Parr

• DOI: 10.3390/wevj14070179 2023

  Research on a Lightweight Panoramic Perception Algorithm for Electric Autonomous Mini-Buses

  Yulin Liu, Gang Li, Liguo Hao, Qiang Yang, Dong Zhang

• DOI: 10.4271/13-05-01-0006 2023

  Dynamics of Adopting Electric Vehicles in India: A Grounded Theory Approach

  Ankit Suri, B. Deepthi, Yogesh Sharma